South African Skeptics

Deserving a facepalm

Tweefo · 126 · 33803
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 9   Go Down

Offline BoogieMonster

  • NP complete
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 3321
    • Skeptical ability: +19/-1
Reply #30 on: October 12, 2015, 15:50:35 pm
"Monkey killing monkey killing monkey over pieces of the ground, Silly monkeys, give them thumbs, they make a club and beat their brother down. How they survive, so misguided, is a mystery. Repugnant is a creature who would squander the ability to lift an eye to heaven, conscious of his fleeting time here" - Tool

Offline Tweefo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 1581
    • Skeptical ability: +10/-0
    • African Sky Planetaruim
Reply #31 on: October 12, 2015, 21:21:01 pm
Had a nice FB fight on the weekend on this. http://tac3news.com/nasa-proves-the-bible-is-true-the-missing-day/ I came across this some 25 to 30 years ago and I still cannot understand that anybody can be taken in by this. But the reason for the fight may have been my opening - "How bankrupt must a belief system be to use this as evidence?" It went downhill fast from there.  ;D
If you don't agree with me you are obviously not from this planet.

Offline Rigil Kent

  • Third Party Cookie
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2563
    • Skeptical ability: +20/-3
  • Three men make a tiger.
Reply #32 on: October 12, 2015, 21:36:29 pm
It is a good job that in Joshua's day the sun still went around the earth. If it was anything like today, the Earth stopping dead in its tracks would be quite catastrophic. Both for Joshua and his rivals.
You know it's cold outside when you go outside and it's cold.

Offline Tweefo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 1581
    • Skeptical ability: +10/-0
    • African Sky Planetaruim
Reply #33 on: October 13, 2015, 09:15:44 am
Quote from: Rigil Kent on October 12, 2015, 21:36:29 pm
It is a good job that in Joshua's day the sun still went around the earth. If it was anything like today, the Earth stopping dead in its tracks would be quite catastrophic. Both for Joshua and his rivals.
This was pointed out to her, but of course not spelled out as nice as this. Will use this in future if I may. This is actually a good argument to show that, it was not a god (knows everything) but man who wrote the bible.
If you don't agree with me you are obviously not from this planet.

Offline BoogieMonster

  • NP complete
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 3321
    • Skeptical ability: +19/-1
Reply #34 on: October 18, 2015, 09:24:05 am
Making dogs swear an oath on the bible.  (wtf!!)

"Monkey killing monkey killing monkey over pieces of the ground, Silly monkeys, give them thumbs, they make a club and beat their brother down. How they survive, so misguided, is a mystery. Repugnant is a creature who would squander the ability to lift an eye to heaven, conscious of his fleeting time here" - Tool

Offline BoogieMonster

  • NP complete
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 3321
    • Skeptical ability: +19/-1
Reply #35 on: October 19, 2015, 15:34:14 pm
"Monkey killing monkey killing monkey over pieces of the ground, Silly monkeys, give them thumbs, they make a club and beat their brother down. How they survive, so misguided, is a mystery. Repugnant is a creature who would squander the ability to lift an eye to heaven, conscious of his fleeting time here" - Tool

Offline brianvds

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2094
    • Skeptical ability: +15/-0
    • Brian van der Spuy
Reply #36 on: October 20, 2015, 04:07:04 am
The thing that irritates me the most about that whole Isis debate is the last bit: "...I would of changed my name." Don't know why, but of all the very American grammar errors out there, that one uniquely send me up the wall. I can deal with stuff like the very common there/their/they're errors. But "would of"? EEEEEEKKKK!

Offline Rigil Kent

  • Third Party Cookie
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2563
    • Skeptical ability: +20/-3
  • Three men make a tiger.
Reply #37 on: October 20, 2015, 06:18:33 am
Chances are that you won't find a bottle with your name on it when you are rummaging through the supermarket fridge looking for a cola drink. I wonder if market research confirmed that Joe Anyman would rather pick a bottle of Coke bearing another first name than opt for a more anonymous Pepsi. I don't fancy drinking someone else's soda. What if they backwash?

Rigil
You know it's cold outside when you go outside and it's cold.

Offline BoogieMonster

  • NP complete
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 3321
    • Skeptical ability: +19/-1
Reply #38 on: October 20, 2015, 09:33:21 am
Quote from: brianvds on October 20, 2015, 04:07:04 am
But "would of"? EEEEEEKKKK!

Technically if enough of them do it, it will become canonical American English.
"Monkey killing monkey killing monkey over pieces of the ground, Silly monkeys, give them thumbs, they make a club and beat their brother down. How they survive, so misguided, is a mystery. Repugnant is a creature who would squander the ability to lift an eye to heaven, conscious of his fleeting time here" - Tool

Offline brianvds

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2094
    • Skeptical ability: +15/-0
    • Brian van der Spuy
Reply #39 on: October 20, 2015, 14:45:26 pm
Quote from: BoogieMonster on October 20, 2015, 09:33:21 am
Quote from: brianvds on October 20, 2015, 04:07:04 am
But "would of"? EEEEEEKKKK!

Technically if enough of them do it, it will become canonical American English.

I suppose so yes. But it still makes my skin crawl. Lots of new words do so, e.g. "learner" instead of the old-fashioned, and presumably politically incorrect, "pupil." And in Afrikaans, "me" instead of mevrou or mejuffrou. Incidentally, is there an English equivalent, or is it still acceptable in English to talk about miss and mrs?

Another irritating Americanism: "off of." E.g. I made a whole lot of money off of this project.

Offline st0nes

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 942
    • Skeptical ability: +10/-1
    • Grumpy Old Man
Reply #40 on: October 20, 2015, 14:54:50 pm
Quote from: brianvds on October 20, 2015, 04:07:04 am
The thing that irritates me the most about that whole Isis debate is the last bit: "...I would of changed my name." Don't know why, but of all the very American grammar errors out there, that one uniquely send me up the wall. I can deal with stuff like the very common there/their/they're errors. But "would of"? EEEEEEKKKK!
OK, this is what happened: 'would have' was contracted to 'would've' which sounds a bit like 'would of.' It's a spelling mistake rather than a grammatical one.

The one that gets me most is the insertion of apostrophes in plurals.  The rule for plurals in English is one of the simplest in the language: append an 's' to the end of the word (OK, there are exceptions, but they are few), and yet I see 'taxi's', 'video's' 'camera's', even bloody 'dog's.'  Taxis, videos, cameras and dogs, FFS!
Tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.--Groucho Marx

Offline Hermes

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 1137
    • Skeptical ability: +18/-2
Reply #41 on: October 20, 2015, 14:57:39 pm
In English the abbreviation Ms. is used.  The idea is to get away from indicating the female's marital status.
My thoughts, my beliefs, my feelings are all in my brain.  My brain is going to rot. - Richard Dawkins

Offline Hermes

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 1137
    • Skeptical ability: +18/-2
Reply #42 on: October 20, 2015, 15:02:54 pm
Quote from: st0nes on October 20, 2015, 14:54:50 pm
The one that gets me most is the insertion of apostrophes in plurals.  The rule for plurals in English is one of the simplest in the language: append an 's' to the end of the word (OK, there are exceptions, but they are few), and yet I see 'taxi's', 'video's' 'camera's', even bloody 'dog's.'  Taxis, videos, cameras and dogs, FFS!
It is sometimes called the grocer's apostrophe for obvious reasons.
My thoughts, my beliefs, my feelings are all in my brain.  My brain is going to rot. - Richard Dawkins

Offline brianvds

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2094
    • Skeptical ability: +15/-0
    • Brian van der Spuy
Reply #43 on: October 20, 2015, 16:58:40 pm
Quote
In English the abbreviation Ms. is used.  The idea is to get away from indicating the female's marital status.

From what I hear, in Germany they used to have fraulein and frau, but now just use frau. We might have gone the same way in other languages, instead of inventing hideous constructions.

Quote
It is sometimes called the grocer's apostrophe for obvious reasons.

I'm a bit slow; it is not obvious to me at all.

Offline Rigil Kent

  • Third Party Cookie
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2563
    • Skeptical ability: +20/-3
  • Three men make a tiger.
Reply #44 on: October 20, 2015, 17:05:56 pm
Special's today:
Tomato's
Potatato's
Mango's

 ;)
You know it's cold outside when you go outside and it's cold.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 9   Go Up